|
Post by Forward Bound on Mar 14, 2008 20:24:55 GMT
It put's tar in your lungs.
|
|
|
Post by Alter on Mar 15, 2008 20:03:37 GMT
Watch me pwn this:
Oddly there's no mention of the mental dependence.. who said anyone was calling it a physical one? Not to mention most people smoke weed with a lil cigarette shit mixed in right? so... erm.. nicotine anyone? You know, one of the most addictive substances...? Weed on it's own might not, but with nicotine it will. Nice wait to twist the question[/quote]
Nice vague answer. "not as effective for many patients".. so basically it's saying that theres a high chance it is more effective than smoking, but through careful wording they can imply that it's not. Many could be 1million of the text subjects. If there were 10million subjects in total, thats many, but not most. if it was being credible it woulda said most, if that shit is true. and guys, weed, or a tablet that doesn't get you high? what are you gonna say yes to?
Evidence? or do i see an unbacked statement#?
don't you love how they add on a second bit, to make the statement extra specific, and thus can brush off the bit that makes sense. Read only the 1st sentence in that "myth". Honestly, you wanna say there's NO truth in that? I'm not saying it's 100%, but i know plenty of weed heads who'd agree with that themselves.
so Herbs never get paranoid? you know.. paranoia, that Mental Illness? It's a form of Psychological Damage? lol
Twisting words. Causes? No maybe not, contributes to? You're seriously saying you've never heard of a herb stealing or shit to get blunted? Ya know the way weed makes you feel uninhibited? do stuff you wouldn't normally maybe (For some folks). but real talk, way to twist words, it must be nice to trick the lowest common denominator of intelligence.
Lol never really heard that one, although the high THC thing is possible.. and do they really think that anyone will perform tests on kids?
I love how they talk soley about cancer and not about any of the illnesses associated with tobacco.. you know the shit they put in with the weed..... cas that's safe to smoke while pregnant...
Can you say Hypocrites? weren't they talking earlier about how all their ANIMAL testing had proved that all these things that people say about weed aint true... and now.. now they're saying animal testing doesn't mean shit? LOFL
1. smoked WITH tobacco.. so yeah... you get the joy of TWO types of carcinogens and not jsut one.. that's not more harmful is it? ¬_¬ 2. i love how they use the "weed smokers smoke less" arguement to disprove it.... if i shoot you in the leg once, or stab you 10 times in the leg, which is more likely to be worse? The stabbing right? Ok what if i shoot you ten times or stab you ten times? the gun righT? do you get that over basic metaphor? fucking herbs lol..
That's just a stupid statement thrown in so that they can let weed play the victim... nobody with a brain would seriously say this without some pretty compelling evidence.
are you for real? cause hydro/skunk/punk etc don't exist do they? and i mean, its not like that's the shit people go after, everyone's going after the mild shit aren't they? fuckouttahere
Some bullshit there.
|
|
|
Post by kii on Mar 15, 2008 21:00:21 GMT
my brother died from canibus.
|
|
|
Post by InFLuenCe on Mar 17, 2008 5:37:02 GMT
hey docters smoke more weed than anybody shit even the smartest and ingenus mind smoke weed
|
|
|
Post by Thinker Thought on Mar 17, 2008 5:57:22 GMT
hey docters smoke more weed than anybody shit even the smartest and ingenus mind smoke weed 1. You have no *credible* sources of information to prove your statement.. 2. Even if you did have 1, it still wouldn't prove that a) weed is not a drug and b) weed is not harmful.. Both of which they are..
|
|
|
Post by Alter on Mar 17, 2008 17:26:00 GMT
sorry.. redid my coding btw... my post shoudl read properly now
|
|
|
Post by kirby on Mar 17, 2008 21:28:05 GMT
Have u ever gotten high alter?!
simple question.. and not this UK shwag bud, sticks n berrier's.
... If not, ur opinion doesnt really mean anything unless U can fully say you've been on both sides of the arguement
|
|
|
Post by InFLuenCe on Mar 17, 2008 23:28:36 GMT
true +rep v lets hear his arguement
|
|
|
Post by kii on Mar 18, 2008 0:27:44 GMT
Fatal Plague you shouldn't be able to smoke it if you can't grasp that it's a drug. Anything that stimulates your brain in anyway, taking you from your natural mind state is a drug. End of discussion. read what it says..
|
|
|
Post by OG Paragenik on Mar 21, 2008 6:40:55 GMT
here is a sited source WEED DOES NOT KILL HARM OR DESTROY LIVES! the end Respect Reptillian It obviously does harm, that's a given. But what you should be debating is how much harm it actually does. Of course it harms..but it does MANY good things for the body as well..(As seen on the first page) ..as with any drug ...cuz i know everyone's seen the commericals for even just cold medicine, you hear the monotone dude talking about all the FUCKED up side effects of that, and other meds?...But im guessing alot of you would take that in a SECOND, because its being advertised and supported by the government and doctors,...and since weed doesnt have that backing support, you're all going to assume its bad...but watch, the moment it becomes legal and they start having those weird ass commercials advertising it, you'll change your views, i hate to sound like an presumptuous cock, but cmon now....think about it, weed is being widely accepted for medicine now a days, and i think it will come to a point where we will be able to pick a bud filled spliff at any local gas station. also, my balls are huge .
|
|
|
Post by Alter on Mar 21, 2008 13:17:16 GMT
«Kü®bẕẕ». valid point, but does my personal experience matter when talking facts? And no, i haven't. Personal choice.
|
|
|
Post by kirby on Mar 21, 2008 17:57:35 GMT
Thats like me preaching about a college being better than another one, due to.."facts" ... I have no place jumping in that conversation, so I dont think ur opinion on this subject is gonna be taking into heavy consideration...
just how I feel...
|
|
|
Post by Sess on Mar 22, 2008 4:24:32 GMT
@ Alter...
1: A lil cigarrette in it is called a spliff. Not many people really do that, and they would still only be dependant on nicotine, not weed.
2: Didn't read anything else.
|
|
|
Post by Alter on Mar 23, 2008 12:29:08 GMT
^Lots do over here. shoulda remembered the cross atlantic difference
|
|
|
Post by Krucial on Mar 23, 2008 21:11:25 GMT
Damn... Y'all dont put Tobacco in joints?
|
|
|
Post by hierographics on Mar 24, 2008 11:16:05 GMT
lol @ all this.
first off i smoked weed from 14 - 21 most of the time it was laced in a black and mild other times it was a joint, or bong hit. i've been done smoking for years now i didn't have any withdraws and im not addicted some of my old friends have quit easy too so i dont see the facts in the addiction argument. sorry.
goodday
|
|
|
Post by InFLuenCe on Mar 25, 2008 3:03:11 GMT
yeah i stoped smoking weed since new years cause of this job
|
|
|
Post by kirby on Mar 26, 2008 18:10:09 GMT
Lmao at this hierographics fool. I like how dude starts trying to tell us wat's wat with the reefer. I've burnt weed Everyday, im talking like.. a quarter a day, for 7 year's...
talk to me when I havnt burnt,...IM VEXXED
is that addiction? yea,.. and Im still cool with it...
Embrace the mighty ganja sprout
|
|
|
Post by Krucial on Mar 26, 2008 18:30:48 GMT
You pothead. Damn...
You not depressed or just a full on fuck up yet? Lol
|
|
|
Post by kirby on Mar 26, 2008 22:20:50 GMT
Nahhhhhh mannnnnnn see, I dont smoke cause it's there... I full out smoke..TO GET HIGH.
...and honestly, more shit happens when u burn... maybe its cause ur judgement, but real talk.. u take a stoner, and someone who doesnt smoke...put em same party, same night... next day, who has the better storys??!?!?!?!?!
EXACTLY
|
|