|
Post by Forward Bound on Feb 15, 2008 18:29:43 GMT
Alright check this out. Something I have been noticing, people's votes are nearly identical to everyone else's during battles. Even when there is times, someone can vote both ways. They usually just end up agreeing with the first poster no matter what. Especially when a newer head votes after a vet or someone a little more experienced. So maybe if you could queue votes on a battle till it is completed, then the votes will start looking a whole lot different. Like you know just leave it in queue to be reviewed, and wait till there is enough votes till the battle is over and then allow the votes to be shown. Alter you may say it's alot of work, I understand that bruh. So maybe you could at least do it in the Alias Tourney. And make a special forum where it was just battles. and put the disscussion in a sub-forum or something... And I would be willing to bet the votes look a lot different. This has nothing to do with people being shady bruh. I just feel this shit is more to do with sub-concious dogs... Or maybe try it out for 3 days in the dome, and see the difference in votes. Oh
|
|
|
Post by Alter on Feb 15, 2008 23:04:50 GMT
i'm mad confused, explain in simple terms to me lol i dnot i'm just not getting what you're saying
|
|
|
Post by JFX on Feb 15, 2008 23:08:24 GMT
dont do what he says i do it alot <.<
|
|
|
Post by Forward Bound on Feb 15, 2008 23:10:42 GMT
Im pretty sure this a queue option where you can review all posts and confirm them before they are actually posted. I think dood's are making up bullshit votes since almost everyones vote is nearly identical vote to the person above them. So I feel maybe as an experiment you should make a voting booth sub-forum and move battles that have verses in them to be voted on there. And then queue the forum, and wait till the battle has sufficent votes before you confirm the posts to posted.
|
|
|
Post by Bleu. on Feb 15, 2008 23:13:27 GMT
Word to Orlando i was honestly thinkin about that
It's a rare occurance i see a battle go with atleast 1 vote on each side, even when it isnt landslide, people are afraid of going against someones opinion b/c they dont wanna be ridiculed or some shit.
I was thinking something like you could PM someone your votes and they keep them all until the battles done
|
|
|
Post by JFX on Feb 15, 2008 23:21:53 GMT
this is a decent idea just pm your votes the battle mod but w/e the votes overflow say rase vs admantine and the mod ends up with rase 4 - 4 admantine what thn cas ya will need to know when they were set anyway it tell ya the time of pm
|
|
|
Post by Bleu. on Feb 15, 2008 23:28:15 GMT
you can have designated people to forward votes for each specific battle too, so it organized
All the votes from battle A go to Adamantie All votes for battle B go to JMC etc etc
|
|
|
Post by Alter on Feb 15, 2008 23:49:36 GMT
i like this man, i do... i'ma have to talk to the boss about codes, but sounds good. anyone on PBS if you find one, pm me
|
|
|
Post by Forward Bound on Feb 26, 2008 2:46:38 GMT
Alright guy's we need to revive this shit...This has been happening alot lately, most recently on R.E. It seems like a battle vote is the biggest form of swaying in every battle, and it is viewed legitly by other heads, as this person seems to be in the neutral. Im not saying that people are dickriding, but too lazy too really look into the verse and vote from what they truely think.
|
|
|
Post by Bleu. on Feb 26, 2008 22:28:03 GMT
I Agree with Orlando
This needs to be looked at...it really wouldnt be a hard thing to do, and it will improve the legitimacy of battles.
|
|