|
|
Post by Alter on Feb 9, 2009 20:22:21 GMT
Version 1 Version 2 (darker) thoughts and comments? That'll be $200 btw biggz lol
|
|
|
|
Post by BiGGz! {TGcKP} on Feb 9, 2009 20:28:40 GMT
200$?! 
Rolf, Naw.. Good 200$ Investment Here. Lol
|
|
|
|
Post by CJM on Feb 9, 2009 20:34:41 GMT
The darker ones better. Although you over-stroked it. It looks all jagged on the edge of the white. Backgrounds good but wtf with that C4D on the left, looking like some sort of flamin' town. Good stuff.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alter on Feb 9, 2009 20:41:49 GMT
Hahah yeah i saw the effect and ran with it.. I thought it looked better on the lighter sig though, a little less on fire and more just bright.
I get what you mean about the white.. but i kinda feel it.
also connor, opinions on the tag now it has the 1px stroke?
but thanks, i may redo and repost
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr.Machete??? on Feb 9, 2009 22:47:01 GMT
Pretty good but for the tag i make mines noticiable not you have to look for it. Because it takes away from the sig if you have big white text on the side that doesn't go with the sig. I found my self just staring at it. if you can lower the if i remember opacity on the c4 layer so its still alittle red but not that noticitable
|
|
|
|
Post by CJM on Feb 10, 2009 3:24:12 GMT
The tag's better with a stroke, but it's just a horrible font.
|
|
|
|
Post by krazie on Feb 10, 2009 3:46:37 GMT
i think alters tag is the dopest
|
|
|
|
Post by Alter on Feb 10, 2009 3:59:08 GMT
Sue me..
|
|
|
|
Post by CJM on Feb 10, 2009 4:41:07 GMT
It's too broard.
|
|
